I'm not the world's most religious person. I may, in fact, be the world's least religious person. I don't like being termed an 'atheist' because that really isn't how I define myself, any more than I define myself as someone who doesn't believe in unicorns.
So I was a little surprised to see my name on Yahoo! Voices in an article about the national Day of Prayer in (I think) the US. I was even more surprised to see the article suggest that I'd written an article supporting the existence of God.
Here's the original article...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e961/5e9612e38c920dea10784c3f2022fe1d7ceb843d" alt=""
(click to enlarge)
And, if you want, you can read it on inthenews.co.uk - I'd recommend you have a decent pop-up blocker before clicking that link.
Now, you might think the take-home messages from that article are as follows:
- natural disasters on two continents
- massive and widespread devastation
- significant loss of life
But, if you're Yahoo! Voices contributor Faithe Reid-Liburd, you take it as evidence that there's a God.
Her article is here, and in it she writes:
"It is outstanding, that despite what is going on in Japan, they would offer to be a blessing to the U.S. Once again, we prayed for all the areas in the U.S. that were ravished by the tornadoes on April 27, 2011. God is a sustaining God."
I'm not sure, but with a death toll in excess of 25,000 people, I'd say God is a vengeful God.
Anyway, the point is this: I don't believe there's a God. I never wrote that article with the intention of hinting there might be some divine power behind Japan's donation to the US. If anything, I wrote it to demonstrate the strength of human spirit that existed in post-tsunami Japan at the time.
But the power of words is such that my article found its way into a piece about the value of prayer - and the sustainability of God.